Acf Image Upload and Wp User Avatar Conflict
Less than two weeks after publishing nigh the broken user experience of the former Dark Mode plugin beingness renamed and repurposed, another plugin development company decided to do the same. The consensus seems to be that this is a bad idea. However, the ProfilePress Team forged ahead and repurposed the WP User Avatar plugin.
Instead of a simple, single-purpose custom avatar solution, information technology is a total-fledged user registration, profile, login, and membership management plugin.
It is now called ProfilePress. Merely, let's call it ProfilePress Low-cal because there is a commercial component where y'all can upgrade to the actual ProfilePress premium plugin. We demand to differentiate the two. Plus, the plugin itself uses that term, at least once, in the admin.
The difference between the Nighttime Fashion switcheroo and this one is that WP User Avatar has over 400,000 active installs, and users are voting with their feet. And their ratings. In the past 48 hours, the plugin has received a staggering 60+ one-star reviews — and counting. The WordPress.org support team has already had to close two forum topics. A review titled "Unexpected changes, expected reactions" sums up the situation.
Over 400,000 users can do a lot of impairment in a piffling bit of time.
A fraction of a fraction of a fraction of those 400,000 users can knock a respectable iv.4 rating downwards to 3.6 in ii days.
When no one from the company responds to any of the 60+ reviews, it looks like you have something to hide. Those are 60+ opportunities to at to the lowest degree attempt to smooth things over.
Pre-3.0, WP User Avatar was a simple plugin for managing how avatars were handled on the site and allowing custom photo uploads on a per-user basis. In the plugin's 8-year history, users had come to wait a solid plugin that handled one matter and handled it well.
In Apr 2020, the plugin inverse buying. ProfilePress had taken over from Flipper Code, the project's just correspondent since 2014. Bangbay Siboliban was listed equally the plugin owner from 2013-2014. It is unclear if this was an acquisition or a simple transfer. Neither the former nor the current possessor has responded to a asking for annotate at this time.
Under new ownership and its version 2.2.5 – 2.2.9 plugin upgrades in the by year, everything seemed to exist status quo. ProfilePress kept the plugin going, fixing bugs for multiple releases. Until two days ago, users were likely unaware that a tidal wave of change was roaring their fashion. No announcements on the ProfilePress blog. No pasty topics in the WordPress.org back up forum. Simply, hither's your new membership plugin that you lot didn't ask for.
Users were greeted with a new settings screen and much more, an admin that was barely recognizable.
As one user put it, "What the heck? Updated plugin and suddenly I have a full membership solution."
"You had the plugin WP User Avatar that did one specific role — added an avatar to users similar when they exit comments on the web log," wrote another reviewer. "Now I go to update it, and Blast, a 100% completely different plugin takes its place. "
ProfilePress, the premium plugin, launched in 2015. It is a known production with an existing userbase. I cannot imagine any scenario that makes sense where the visitor takes a carve up plugin that it acquired and implants a lite version of its premium product inside.
Except to capitalize on the 400,000+ active installs for a quick and easy profit.
The knee-jerk reaction is usually to demand the WordPress.org Plugin Review Team implement a dominion against information technology. Some scenarios are less egregious than others. Drawing a subjective line in the sand tin exist a tough enquire of them.
I am coming effectually to the thought of putting this determination into the hands of users. They are using the review organization in the way it was meant to be used. Let them pelting downwards all manner of hell on plugin authors who do this. Let them prop up another plugin with their numbers and paw out glowing five-star reviews for it. WP User Avatars (with an 'southward') was a decent culling the concluding I tried it.
All the same, I wonder how much this hurts the plugin with its active install full. The possessor might just atmospheric condition the storm and capitalize on the users left standing when the dust settles. Even if they lost an unlikely quarter or half of their install count, they are yet in a position to profit from premium upgrades. Then, build a new base from users who are unaware of this current debacle.
The more companies that practise information technology without repercussions, the more probable it becomes a tendency. But, WP User Avatar's, ProfilePress's, ahem, ProfilePress Lite's users are in open rebellion. Maybe the market will simply make up one's mind.
gustafsonpereadesen.blogspot.com
Source: https://wptavern.com/profilepress-rebrands-and-repurposes-wp-user-avatar-now-a-membership-plugin-users-revolt-via-the-wordpress-review-system
0 Response to "Acf Image Upload and Wp User Avatar Conflict"
Post a Comment